ALPR surveillance

Opposed ALPR cameras without transparency; asked for clear public rules on data storage, access and logging.

Opposed surveillance generally; favored a citywide surveillance ordinance and independent oversight before contracts.

Warned about Axon's bundled ecosystem and vertical integration; suggested Human Rights and Equity Commission review and a civilian police review board.

Cited 279 Flock queries by federal immigration authorities in three weeks; asked council to fix Policy 428, pause new ALPR contracts, and adopt a surveillance ordinance.

Said rules aren't ready; asked who controls encryption keys, questioned cameras at city entry/exit points, and filed a petition to review Policy 428 before the contract.

Opposed any ALPR system; asked council to carve surveillance tech out of the city manager's $250,000 approval authority so expansions require a public vote.

Asked for a council-adopted surveillance ordinance to guide ALPR contract approval, meeting at minimum SB 1516.

Asked for a pause and a surveillance ordinance with input from privacy experts; criticized Axon's ICE/DHS contracts and vendor self-auditing.

La Pine computer-security professional; said Policy 428's biggest hole is vendor access to data and urged end-to-end encryption with city-held keys.

Called Axon cameras mass surveillance in search of a problem; questioned breach notification and asked who is most vulnerable to abuse.