Short-term rental amendments
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 15, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Supported the amendment as written and objected to an undisclosed alternative being considered.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:37:32 →Cited a 118-signature neighborhood petition against STRs in supporting the amendments.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:39:59 →Supported the changes, calling CN properties residential and opposing any STR carve-out.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:40:40 →Opposed the changes, asking for grandfathering for owners who relied on prior rules.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:43:03 →Opposed the amendments, saying the 500-foot rule is a de facto ban in Old Bend.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:45:10 →Iron Horse owner said he invested hundreds of thousands relying on city staff guidance allowing multiple STRs, and asked for the record to stay open.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:47:03 →A realtor worried the change undermines investor confidence in Bend's regulatory stability.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:49:51 →Said he and Akers invested $5.2 million relying on four STR permits; long-term rentals wouldn't cover the debt.
City Council Business Meeting - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:52:00 →